The Fox and the Mosquitoes Flashcards
by Aesop — tap or click to flip
Flashcard Review
Flashcards: The Fox and the Mosquitoes
What is the moral of The Fox and the Mosquitoes?
The moral is <b>"Better to bear a known evil than risk an unknown one."</b> The fox understands that the mosquitoes currently feeding on him are nearly full and taking little blood. Driving them away would only attract a fresh, hungry swarm that would drain him completely. The fable teaches that removing a familiar problem can sometimes create a far worse one — a lesson Aesop applied directly to corrupt politicians.
Why did Aristotle use this fable in his Rhetoric?
Aristotle recorded this fable in <i>Rhetoric</i> (Book II, Chapter 20) as an example of how Aesop used storytelling for political persuasion. According to Aristotle, Aesop told this story to the people of Samos when they were about to execute a popular leader accused of embezzlement. Aesop argued that this leader had already enriched himself and would steal no more, while his successor would arrive hungry and take even more. It remains one of the earliest recorded uses of a fable as a direct political argument.
What is the Perry Index number for The Fox and the Mosquitoes?
This fable is cataloged as <b>Perry Index 427</b>, also known as "The Fox, the Flies, and the Hedgehog" or "The Fox and the Hedgehog." The Perry Index is the standard scholarly classification system for Aesop's fables, created by classicist Ben Edwin Perry. Different retellings feature mosquitoes, flies, or ticks as the blood-sucking insects, but the core story and moral remain the same across all versions.
How does this fable compare to The Fisherman and the Little Fish?
Both fables teach <b>pragmatic decision-making</b> when facing imperfect choices. In <a href="/author/aesop/short-story/the-fisherman-and-the-little-fish/" class="al-title">The Fisherman and the Little Fish</a>, a fisherman must decide whether to keep a small catch now or release it hoping for a bigger one later. The fox in this fable faces a similar calculation — keep the sated mosquitoes or risk hungrier replacements. Both warn against gambling a sure thing on an uncertain future, though the fisherman's choice is about greed while the fox's is about survival.
What political lessons does The Fox and the Mosquitoes teach?
The fable is one of Aesop's most explicitly political stories. Its core lesson — that replacing corrupt officials may invite worse ones — has been applied to governance for over 2,000 years. The sated mosquitoes represent leaders who have already enriched themselves and have less incentive to plunder. Fresh mosquitoes represent ambitious newcomers with everything to gain. This mirrors the argument in <a href="/author/aesop/short-story/the-lion-and-the-ass/" class="al-title">The Lion and the Ass</a>, where power dynamics and self-interest drive behavior. The fable does not defend corruption — it warns that naive reform can backfire.
Why does the fox refuse the hedgehog's help?
The fox refuses because he has made a <b>rational calculation about risk</b>. The current mosquitoes are nearly full and consuming very little blood. If the hedgehog drives them away, a new swarm of hungry mosquitoes will replace them and drain the fox's remaining blood entirely. The fox's refusal is not stubbornness but wisdom — he recognizes that well-intentioned help can cause more harm than the original problem. This theme of unintended consequences also appears in <a href="/author/aesop/short-story/two-travelers-and-a-bear/" class="al-title">Two Travelers and a Bear</a>, where crisis reveals the true cost of misplaced trust.
What other versions of this fable exist?
The fable has been retold across centuries and cultures. La Fontaine adapted it as <i>Le Renard, les Mouches et le Hérisson</i> in his celebrated French collection. Samuel Croxall and Thomas Bewick each published English versions with expanded political commentary. The blood-sucking creatures vary — <b>mosquitoes, flies, or ticks</b> depending on the translation — but the moral never changes. The story's adaptability is part of its power, much like <a href="/author/aesop/short-story/the-quack-toad/" class="al-title">The Quack Toad</a>, another fable about seeing through false promises to recognize what truly serves your interest.
Is this the same fable referenced in Isaiah Berlin's "The Hedgehog and the Fox"?
Isaiah Berlin's famous 1953 essay <i>The Hedgehog and the Fox</i> borrows its title from a different Aesop fragment — "The fox knows many things, but the hedgehog knows one big thing" (attributed to the poet Archilochus). While Berlin's essay features the same two animals, his metaphor about intellectual styles is <b>entirely separate</b> from this fable's political lesson about tolerating known evils. The coincidence of characters has caused occasional confusion, but the two works address completely different ideas.