Frequently Asked Questions
What is Mr. Dolphus Raymond's secret in Chapter 20?
Mr. Dolphus Raymond's secret is that his paper sack contains a bottle of Coca-Cola, not whiskey. The entire town of Maycomb believes he is an alcoholic who drinks from a paper bag, but his supposed drunkenness is a deliberate performance. Raymond explains to Scout and Dill that he pretends to be a drunk because it gives the white people of Maycomb a reason they can understand for why he chooses to live with a Black woman and have mixed-race children. Rather than forcing the town to accept that he simply prefers his life as it is, he provides them with a comfortable fiction—they can blame alcohol for his choices instead of confronting their own inability to comprehend a white man who willingly crosses racial boundaries.
What are the main points of Atticus's closing argument in Chapter 20?
Atticus's closing argument makes several key points. First, he emphasizes that the prosecution has produced no medical evidence—no doctor was ever called to examine Mayella Ewell. Second, he highlights the physical impossibility of Tom Robinson committing the assault: Mayella's bruises were on the right side of her face, indicating a left-handed attacker, but Tom's left arm has been useless since a childhood cotton gin accident. Bob Ewell, by contrast, is left-handed. Third, Atticus argues that Mayella broke an unwritten social code by kissing a Black man, and that her father beat her when he discovered it. The Ewells then conspired to blame Tom Robinson to cover their shame. Finally, Atticus appeals to the jury's sense of duty, invoking the principle that the courts are the one American institution where all people are truly equal, and asks the jury, in the name of God, to believe Tom Robinson.
Why does Dolphus Raymond share his secret with Scout and Dill?
Raymond shares his secret specifically because Scout and Dill are children. He tells them that children have not yet learned to suppress their natural moral instincts the way adults in Maycomb have. When Dill became sick at the way Mr. Gilmer spoke to Tom Robinson during cross-examination, Raymond recognized that reaction as the correct one—an honest human response to cruelty that adults have trained themselves to ignore. Raymond trusts children with the truth because they can still see injustice clearly and respond to it with genuine emotion. He also warns them, with a note of resignation, that as they grow older they may lose the ability to cry about the things they are witnessing in the trial.
Why does Atticus remove his coat during his closing argument?
When Atticus removes his coat, unbuttons his vest, and loosens his tie before addressing the jury, it shocks Scout and Jem because they have never seen their father in any state of public undress. Scout describes it as the equivalent of him standing before the courtroom naked. This gesture is symbolically significant: Atticus is stripping away the professional formality that usually shields him, making himself emotionally vulnerable before the jury. By abandoning his usual composed exterior, he signals that this is not a routine legal performance—he is speaking from deep personal conviction. The act also levels the distance between Atticus and the jurors, allowing him to address them as fellow human beings rather than from behind the authority of his profession.
What social code does Atticus say Mayella Ewell broke?
According to Atticus, Mayella broke a "rigid and time-honored code" of Southern society—the racial taboo against a white woman showing romantic or sexual interest in a Black man. Atticus argues that Mayella kissed Tom Robinson, and when her father Bob Ewell caught her, the consequences were severe. Bob beat his daughter, and the two of them then conspired to put Tom on trial for his life. Atticus makes a careful distinction: Mayella committed no legal crime, only a social transgression. He expresses pity for her as a victim of poverty, ignorance, and her father's cruelty, but insists that her guilt and shame over breaking this social code do not justify destroying an innocent man. The entire prosecution, in Atticus's framing, is an attempt to punish Tom Robinson for Mayella's violation of racial customs.
What does Atticus mean when he says "in our courts, all men are created equal"?
Atticus deliberately echoes the Declaration of Independence but narrows the claim to a specific context. He acknowledges openly that people are not equal in everyday life—they differ in intelligence, ability, opportunity, and economic standing. His argument is that the courtroom is the one institution where these differences should not matter. Before the law, a poor man should receive the same justice as a wealthy one, and a Black man should be judged by the same standard as a white man. Atticus appeals to this principle as the jury's sacred obligation, asking them to set aside the prejudices they carry from their daily lives and fulfill the promise the courts are supposed to represent. The power and tragedy of the statement lies in the gap between the ideal Atticus invokes and the reality of the segregated courtroom where he speaks it—with an all-white jury and Black spectators confined to the balcony.